Write For Us – Tech Guest Post on FSI-Blog.com
Write For Us – Tech
If you’ve been searching for a tech blog that actually takes guest posts and treats writers like contributors instead of link buyers, you can stop looking. FSI-Blog publishes developer-focused content, and we’re open to outside writers who know their stuff.
What You Get Out Of It!
Permanent do follow link.
One contextual do follow link placed inside the article where it fits naturally, pointing wherever you want (your site, portfolio, GitHub, or blog). We won’t quietly flip it to no follow later or pull the post once it’s served its purpose for us.
A real byline.
Your name and title on the article, a short bio you write yourself, and a link out. Contribute more than once and you get your own author archive page, the same kind our core developers have.
A genuine developer audience.
Our readers are actively troubleshooting something specific: a build error, a failing database connection, a permission issue on Linux, a hydration bug in Next.js. A link in front of someone already deep in a technical problem does far more than ten times the volume of random traffic.
Fast publishing.
Once a draft is approved it’s usually live within 48 hours, and you get an email with the URL when it goes out.
Who Should Write For Us
You don’t need to be a professional writer, and you don’t need credentials. We’ve run excellent pieces from developers who’d never published anything but knew their corner of the stack cold. What you do need is firsthand technical knowledge and the ability to explain it clearly.
You’re a strong fit if you’re:
A working developer who’s fixed real bugs and can document the fix step by step.
A front-end developer who can explain a tricky CSS or JavaScript behavior in plain terms.
A back-end or systems person comfortable with PHP, Python, SQL, or Linux internals.
Someone building with Next.js or React who’s wrestled the framework and won.
A DevOps or tooling engineer who can walk through a deployment or CI problem.
A technical writer with a real software background.
An SEO professional or blogger who wants a contextual dofollow link from a site with genuine developer traffic, as long as the content earns its place.
What We Publish
Error fixes and debugging guides
—
Our bread and butter. A specific error message, what causes it, and exactly how to resolve it, ideally with the command or code that did it. Aim for at least 1,000 words so there’s real context around the fix.
Language and framework tutorials
—
JavaScript and TypeScript, Python, PHP, SQL, Linux, Next.js, CSS and HTML. Step-by-step builds and “here’s the right way to do X” pieces. These usually run 1,200 words and up because the detail needs room.
Broader development content
—
Web performance and optimization, application security, SaaS and architecture, database design, API work, and dev tooling. If it helps a developer build something better or ship faster, it fits.
What We Won’t Run
Casino, gambling, or betting content, even with a tech wrapper.
Crypto, NFT, or blockchain promotion a genuine technical tutorial is fine, but token shilling isn’t.
Adult or age-restricted material of any kind.
Pharma, supplements, or medical content.
Hacking, cracking, malware, or exploit content meant to cause harm.
Piracy tools or anything built around them.
Thinly disguised ads with no real technical value.
Off-topic pitches lifestyle, travel, and general-finance content won’t land here.
How To Write Something We’ll Actually Publish
A handful of things separate the drafts we publish fast from the ones we send back, and none of them are complicated.
Lead with what you actually did. The best pieces come from people who solved the problem themselves. If you fixed a 500 error caused by a silent database failure, show the exact misconfiguration and the fix, not a generic “check your settings.” Search engines lean hard on firsthand experience now, and specifics are the whole thing.
Write for two readers at once. Most developers skim your headings and code blocks first, then decide whether to read in full. Make every heading say something real, then put the depth underneath for the people who stick around.
Use real code and real output. “Adjust your config” is noise. The actual file, the actual line that changed, and the actual error it cleared is something a reader can copy, test, and trust.
Answer the question up top. If the title promises a fix for a specific error, state the fix in the first couple of sentences, then explain why it works. People have a broken build to get back to.
Format your code properly. Use code blocks, label the language, and keep snippets minimal and runnable. A wall of unformatted code is worse than no code at all.
The Submission Rules, Briefly
Read these before you send anything:
Original and unpublished. It can’t exist anywhere else online. We run plagiarism checks on every draft.
Length: minimum 1,000 words for a focused fix, 1,200+ for tutorials and broader pieces. We’d rather have depth than padding.
Structure: clear headings, short paragraphs, and every code snippet formatted correctly with the language labeled.
Back up your claims with real code, commands, output, or test results, and make sure everything reflects current versions of the language, framework, or tool.
Keywords: work your target term in naturally. Don’t keyword-stuff. Explain any jargon the first time it appears.
Internal links: include two to three to relevant FSI-Blog pages where they fit.
One outbound link to your own site, placed in the body, not in the intro or conclusion.
Format: submit as a Google Doc (comment access) or a .docx, with your bio (50 to 80 words), title, and author photo. Send images separately, at least 800px wide.
How Submitting Works
Pitch your topic. Send the title you have in mind, two or three sentences on what it covers, who it’s for (beginner / intermediate / advanced), and which category or language it falls under.
Get approval and a brief. We read pitches within three to five business days. If yours fits, you’ll get a confirmation with any direction, suggested angles, internal link ideas, and the reviewer handling it.
Write and submit your draft. Follow the guidelines above and send it with your bio and images. Most contributors finish within one to two weeks.
Editorial review. Your reviewer checks accuracy, originality, working code, and guideline compliance. You’ll get one of three answers: approved as-is, approved with minor edits, or returned with specific notes.
Publication. Approved articles go live within 48 hours, and your byline, link, and credit are active the moment it publishes. Share it around; early traffic helps it rank.
How We Judge A Submission
Three things are non-negotiable:
Originality it has to be genuinely yours, and we check.
Technical accuracy broken or outdated code gets it bounced, and we verify the important claims.
Real value it has to teach the reader something they can use, with enough depth to justify the length.
How We Compare To Other Tech Write-For-Us Sites
There are plenty of technology blogs taking guest posts, and they’re not all the same. Here’s the honest comparison.
| FSI-Blog | Generic tech blogs | Link broker sites | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Link | Dofollow, permanent | Often nofollow | Paid, may disappear |
| Byline | Full bio, photo, title | Usually name only | Often none |
| Review | A real developer-editor | Basic or automated | Barely any |
| Audience | Developers fixing real problems | Broad, mixed | Often off-topic |
| Speed | ~48 hours after approval | One to four weeks | Fast if you pay |
| Cost | Free | Usually free | $50 to $500+ |
| Stays up | Permanent | Hit or miss | Gone when you stop paying |
FAQs writers ask:
How do I submit a tech guest post?
Email us with the subject line “Tech Guest Post Pitch – [your topic],” including your title, a short summary, your target reader level, and a writing sample or two. Pitch first; don’t send a full draft cold.
Is the link dofollow?
Yes. One permanent dofollow link in the body, pointing to a legitimate site, portfolio, or profile. Not to gambling, crypto, pharma, adult, or malware destinations.
How long does it need to be?
At least 1,000 words for a tight fix and 1,200 or more for tutorials and broader pieces. Write what the topic actually needs.
Can I submit AI-generated content?
Not raw AI output, and we can tell. If you’ve used a tool as a starting point and genuinely rewritten it with your own knowledge and tested code, that’s fine. Drafts that read like untouched AI text, especially with code that doesn’t run, get rejected.
How fast do you respond?
Pitches in three to five business days, full drafts within a couple of days, and publication within about 48 hours of approval.
Can I republish it on my own site later?
No. Once it’s live here it stays exclusive to us, since duplicate content hurts both sites in search. You’re free to write a separate, distinct piece on a related angle for yourself.
Will my name be on the article?
Yes, permanently – name, title, bio, photo, and your link.
What if my piece is rejected?
You’ll get specific feedback explaining why, usually broken code, factual errors, duplicate content, thin depth, too much promotion, or a banned link. Fix it and you can resubmit if the topic still works.
Send your articles to us through: team@fsi-blog.com (only reach out this email)
Write For Us Tech - FSI-Blog.com 